General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private
- Time Line
- Proposer
- Seconds
- Text
- Amendment Proposer A
- Amendment Seconds A
- Amendment Text A
- Amendment Proposer B
- Amendment Seconds B
- Amendment Text B
- Quorum
- Data and Statistics
- Majority Requirement
- Outcome
Time Line
Proposal and amendment | 2016-09-01 | |
---|---|---|
Discussion Period: | 2016-09-21 | |
Voting Period: | 2016-10-09 00:00:00 UTC | 2016-10-22 23:59:59 UTC |
Proposer
Gunnar Wolf [[email protected]] [text of proposal] [call for vote]
Seconds
- Thibaut Paumard [[email protected]] [mail]
- Holger Levsen [[email protected]] [mail]
- Didier Raboud [[email protected]] [mail]
- Ondrej Sury [[email protected]] [mail]
- Bart Martens [[email protected]] [mail]
- Mathias Behrle [[email protected]] [mail]
Text
Choice 1: Repeal previous GR
Title: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private.- The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private list archives" is repealed.
- In keeping with paragraph 3 of the Debian Social Contract, Debian Developers are strongly encouraged to use the debian-private mailing list only for discussions that should not be disclosed.
Amendment Proposer A
Ian Jackson [[email protected]] [text of amendement]
Amendment Seconds A
- Micha Lenk [[email protected]] [mail]
- Gunnar Wolf [[email protected]] [mail]
- Sven Bartscher [[email protected]] [mail]
- Bas Wijnen [[email protected]] [mail]
- Thibaut Paumard [[email protected]] [mail]
- Russ Allbery [[email protected]] [mail]
Amendment Text A
Choice 2: Acknowledge difficulty
Title: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private- The Debian Project regrets the non-implementation of the 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private list archives". That General Resolution is hereby repealed.
- In case volunteers should come forward: Permission remains for the list archives (of any messages, whether posted before or after this resolution) to be declassified, provided that the declassification process is at least as respecting of the privacy of posters to debian-private as the process set out in the 2005 General Resolution.
- Furthermore, the Debian listmasters remain empowered (subject to the usual consultation processes within the Debian project) to revise the rules governing the privacy and declassification of messages to -private. This includes making measures to make declassification more widely applicable, or easier to automate.
- But, any weakening of the privacy expectations must not be retrospective: changes should apply only to messages posted after the rule change has come into force.
- In particular, we reaffirm this rule: no part of a posting made to -private, which explicitly states that it should not be declassified, may be published (without its author's explicit consent). This rule may be changed by the listmasters (para.3, above), but only for future messages (para.4, above), and only following consultation, and only with ample notice.
- Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.
Amendment Proposer B
Iain Lane [[email protected]] [text of amendement]
Amendment Seconds B
- Ban Wijnen [[email protected]] [mail]
- Ian Jackson [[email protected]] [mail]
- Thibaut Paumard [[email protected]] [mail]
- Steve M. Robbins [[email protected]] [mail]
- Martin F. Krafft [[email protected]] [mail]
- Ritesh Raj Sarraf [[email protected]] [mail]
- Didier Raboud [[email protected]] [mail]
- Bernd Zeimetz [[email protected]] [mail]
- Iustin Pop [[email protected]] [mail]
Amendment Text B
Choice 3: Remain private
Title: debian-private shall remain private The text of the GR is replaced with the following. 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private list archives" is repealed. 2. There shall be no declassification of any portion of the debian-private archives, except in the following circumstances. 2a. Participants may declassify their own material. 2b. Participants may declassify the material of others where consent has explicitly been given by the authors of all of the material being declassified. 3. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.
Quorum
With the current list of voting developers, we have:
Current Developer Count = 1041 Q ( sqrt(#devel) / 2 ) = 16.1322658049017 K min(5, Q ) = 5 Quorum (3 x Q ) = 48.3967974147050
Quorum
- Option1 Reached quorum: 188 > 48.3967974147050
- Option2 Reached quorum: 156 > 48.3967974147050
- Option3 Reached quorum: 186 > 48.3967974147050
Data and Statistics
For this GR, like always, statistics will be gathered about ballots received and acknowledgements sent periodically during the voting period. Additionally, the list of voters will be recorded. Also, the tally sheet will also be made available to be viewed.
Majority Requirement
The proposals need a simple majority
Majority
- Option1 passes Majority. 5.081 (188/37) >= 1
- Option2 passes Majority. 2.328 (156/67) >= 1
- Option3 passes Majority. 4.227 (186/44) >= 1
Outcome
In the graph above, any pink colored nodes imply that the option did not pass majority, the Blue is the winner. The Octagon is used for the options that did not beat the default.
- Option 1 "Repeal previous GR"
- Option 2 "Acknowledge difficulty"
- Option 3 "Remain private"
- Option 4 "Further Discussion"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that option x received over option y. A more detailed explanation of the beat matrix may help in understanding the table. For understanding the Condorcet method, the Wikipedia entry is fairly informative.
Option | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Option 1 | 137 | 83 | 188 | |
Option 2 | 83 | 71 | 156 | |
Option 3 | 130 | 148 | 186 | |
Option 4 | 37 | 67 | 44 |
Looking at row 2, column 1, Acknowledge difficulty
received 83 votes over Repeal previous GR
Looking at row 1, column 2, Repeal previous GR
received 137 votes over Acknowledge difficulty.
Pair-wise defeats
- Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 137 - 83) = 54 votes.
- Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 130 - 83) = 47 votes.
- Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 188 - 37) = 151 votes.
- Option 3 defeats Option 2 by ( 148 - 71) = 77 votes.
- Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 156 - 67) = 89 votes.
- Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 186 - 44) = 142 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains
- Option 3 "Remain private"
The winners
- Option 3 "Remain private"
Debian uses the Condorcet method for voting.
Simplistically, plain Condorcets method
can be stated like so :
Consider all possible two-way races between candidates.
The Condorcet winner, if there is one, is the one
candidate who can beat each other candidate in a two-way
race with that candidate.
The problem is that in complex elections, there may well
be a circular relationship in which A beats B, B beats C,
and C beats A. Most of the variations on Condorcet use
various means of resolving the tie. See
Cloneproof Schwartz Sequential Dropping
for details. Debian's variation is spelled out in the
constitution,
specifically, A.6.
Debian Project Secretary